Interior space as an urban relationship
ARC 2124, Integrated Design Studio II, studies light, color, texture, volume, and human scale through the relationship between architecture and interior space. It carries the site sensitivity developed in Integrated Design Studio I into the interior and prepares students for the tectonic integration of Integrated Design Studio III. Drawing, digital studies, and physical making support an iterative design process.
Artists’ Collective, Cleveland
The main project transforms and expands an existing building beside West Side Market into a rotating-residency artists’ collective. Living, making, exhibition, and performance must coexist with market crowds, transit arrivals, and service access. The shared course brief calls for sectional thinking, circulation as social infrastructure, and carefully layered public/private thresholds.
In my studio section, Loop First, Void Second turns this agenda into a sequence of design decisions. Students begin with the city’s flows and the behavior of different users, establish a credible route through the building, and then develop its rooms, shared voids, and enclosure. Two initial prototypes guide testing: a market-to-roof promenade, and a through-block passage connected to a vertical loop. Both require a legible arrival, places to pause, selective views into making, and a return to the city.
Plans and sections must make the route spatially convincing. Diagrams explain how it is organized; renderings and models examine what it feels like to move, gather, work, and look across levels. The selected work below brings these forms of evidence together for each project.
Method
Loop First, Void Second establishes an order of design decisions. Map the city’s forces and the needs of different users; construct a continuous route in plan and section; then position gathering spaces, voids, program, and enclosure around that route. My lectures use OMA’s circulation and program strategies to make this process legible and testable.
- 01
Read the city and its users
Map market, transit, parking, service, and adjacent-building edges. Write separate movement scenarios for artists, everyday visitors, ticketed audiences, and staff, including busy and quiet periods.
- 02
Establish a sectional loop
Locate a clear street entrance and a return to the city. Connect display, gathering, making overlooks, and roof or terrace destinations. Test level changes and public/private thresholds in plan and section together.
- 03
Turn movement into encounter
Alternate passage with pause. Widen landings into rooms, place seating beside the flow, and connect the route to shared voids at selected levels. Give the public views into creative work while protecting artists’ access and retreat.
- 04
Resolve and communicate the building
Develop program, structure, daylight, and enclosure around the spatial sequence. Use diagrams to explain decisions, plans and sections to verify their relationships, and renderings and models to examine occupation and atmosphere.
From the studio lecture by Teng Teng: urban flows and edge conditions establish the starting constraints for a sectional loop.
Four architectural responses
The projects develop different relationships between circulation and shared space: a cultural route beside historic fabric, a public ground beneath an elevated canopy, interwoven ramps, and a sequence of terraces and interior voids. Each is presented through its analysis, architectural drawings, and spatial experience.
West Path Arts Center · Juan Pineros · Canopy Commons · Dylan Simmons · Visible Works Studio · Asadour Salatyan · Unit SP-2645 · Mateusz Zygadlo
West Path Arts Center — Juan Pineros
A new cultural route links the market district with exhibition, performance, and creative work. The retained street facade anchors the intervention, while the addition opens toward a public forecourt and develops a vertical sequence of shared spaces.
The project’s strength is the connection between its urban reading and its architectural representation: edge studies become arrival and access decisions, and the plans, sectional perspectives, and occupied views show how those decisions produce a public interior.
Urban analysis and spatial organization
Pedestrian movement and the contrasting market, street, and service edges guide the proposal. The circulation and program diagrams place public destinations along a vertical route, with more controlled spaces deeper in the building.
Juan Pineros — movement mapping and the urban edges that inform entry and public access.
Juan Pineros — circulation and program read together: the route connects distinct uses across levels.
Architectural drawings
The site plan locates the public ground within the block. Floor plans and sectional perspectives then make the relationship between the route, performance spaces, and retained fabric available for inspection.
Juan Pineros — the urban footprint and the structural system supporting the new spaces.
Juan Pineros — complementary sectional perspectives reveal overlapping levels and the spaces around the route.
Public life and interior experience
The renderings follow the project from arrival through stairs, galleries, and performance. They make material continuity, visual connections, and the changing scale of the public route visible at the level of occupation.
Juan Pineros — movement beside the retained fabric and arrival within a shared lounge.
Juan Pineros — the public sequence extends from daylit circulation to the collective experience of performance.
Canopy Commons — Dylan Simmons
An elevated private program shelters a public ground connected to the market. The canopy establishes a large civic room, while stairs, terraces, and framed views extend the route through the building.
Dylan’s strongest work is sectional: the broad stair, spanning structure, and suspended volume give the circulation diagram an architectural scale. His separate access and public/private diagrams clarify how artists can share visibility with visitors while retaining routes of their own.
From market movement to a public ground
The initial studies identify a need for both continuity and places to stop. The massing sequence lifts the private spaces and opens the ground, turning the route into the organizing space beneath the canopy.
Dylan Simmons — urban movement is translated into a passage with places for rest and gathering.
Dylan Simmons — the loop’s stopping points and the program arranged around them.
Dylan Simmons — differentiated access, public/private occupation, and framed views. These drawings test selective encounter along the loop.
Plans, section, and structural resolution
The plans show the route within each floor; the two sections expose its continuity between floors. The structural axonometric makes the lifted volume and open public ground legible as a building system.
Dylan Simmons — the site connection and the structure that frees the public ground.
Atmosphere and model verification
The submitted visualizations explore the civic presence of the canopy; close model views test the stair, overhead structure, and cross-level relationships.
Dylan Simmons — street and under-canopy visualizations. The student credits ChatGPT/OpenAI image generation based on his original design.
Dylan Simmons — physical model photographs check the scale of the stair and the spatial continuity beneath the canopy.
Visible Works Studio — Asadour Salatyan
Two ramp systems organize the relationship between artists and visitors. They extend outward to form the entrance, pass exhibition and viewing areas, and maintain visual contact while separating public movement from studio and backstage access.
The project makes the teaching method especially explicit: a circulation line generates the entrance and building volume, then becomes a sequence of rooms in plan and section. Glazing and the roof develop the further question of how making, gathering, and performance become visible and daylit.
Asadour Salatyan — the outward-reaching ramps announce the public route at the street.
A dual route and a visible entrance
Street and parking studies establish the arrival conditions. Ramp iterations then separate users while creating points of connection; the entrance is developed as the beginning of this spatial sequence.
Asadour Salatyan — street movement and parking conditions frame the need for a clear, inviting pedestrian entrance.
Asadour Salatyan — the loop develops into an entrance rather than ending at the building boundary.
Asadour Salatyan — differentiated paths and program: exhibition follows the visitor route while artists retain controlled access.
The loop in plan and section
The complete floor-plan sequence and paired sectional perspectives allow the ramp diagram to be compared with occupied rooms. The site drawings relate the resulting building to its block and the market skyline.
Asadour Salatyan — site plan and urban section.
Asadour Salatyan — first- and second-floor plans.
Asadour Salatyan — third-floor plan and the drawing labelled floors four and five continue the route through exhibition and performance programs.
Asadour Salatyan — two sectional perspectives show the ramp system, shared voids, and changes of level.
Daylight, visibility, and enclosure
The interior views examine how the public route is inhabited: the roof brings light into gathering space, while glazing exposes activity along circulation. Structural and physical studies connect this spatial intention to the building’s assembly.
Asadour Salatyan — daylight and visual contact give the circulation sequence spatial character.
Asadour Salatyan — structure and a physical study isolate the systems supporting and organizing movement.
Unit SP-2645 — Mateusz Zygadlo
A continuous route connects exposed studios, exhibition spaces, terraces, and performance. The project statement pairs the visibility of artistic production with places to sit and look toward the market, giving the collective a public role beyond its programmed rooms.
The strongest sequence is the progression from circulation to inhabited form. The diagrams test exterior pauses, solar trimming, structural support, and exposed movement; the plans and sectional perspectives show how these operations produce irregular shared spaces and cross-level connections.
Activity, views, and the development of form
The urban studies identify concentrations of activity and possible visual relationships. The loop and program diagrams establish the organization that the subsequent volume studies develop.
Mateusz Zygadlo — concentrations of activity and views toward the surrounding district.
Mateusz Zygadlo — the movement system and its associated program.
Mateusz Zygadlo — the volume is opened for outdoor pauses and adjusted for sun.
Mateusz Zygadlo — structural support and visible circulation further articulate the form.
Plans and sectional space
Drawings extracted from the original presentation boards show the route within the architectural proposal. Their changing geometry allows the circulation diagram to be read against rooms, voids, terraces, and the retained building.
Mateusz Zygadlo — second- and third-floor plans, extracted at readable scale from the original board.
Mateusz Zygadlo — fourth- and fifth-floor plans show changing program and shared spatial boundaries.
Mateusz Zygadlo — animated plan and section cuts embedded in the original submission. Moving through the model reveals how the route and voids change across the building.
Movement at the scale of the interior
Close spatial studies examine the pauses and changes in scale within the route: approaching a landing, ascending a stair, moving through a gallery, and looking across a vertical void.
Mateusz Zygadlo — a landing and stair test the transition between movement and shared interior space.
Mateusz Zygadlo — gallery and void studies explore cross-level visibility and changing spatial scale.
Earlier spatial study — Juan Pineros
Assignment 1 explores a smaller domestic interior through sectional drawings, material surfaces, light, and changes of level. Shown separately from the Artists’ Collective, it establishes the course’s attention to inhabitation before the later project expands that inquiry to the city.
Juan Pineros — Assignment 1: sectional studies of the relationship between interior space and its setting.
Juan Pineros — Assignment 1: light, material, and visual connections at the scale of inhabitation.